Bane of Doom vs Bane of Agony

[Geni8itoFos]

Hi paragons, well done on fl loved the "Dont mind be hc".
To the point i would like to ask since aflliction locks count on haste that provides extras ticks for bane of agony why we should use bane of doom?And if we use bane of agony shouldnt it be glyphed?

Thnx

[Diivil]

Doom is simply better DPS in a single target fight. In a fight where you are soulswapping constantly (well, less now that the cooldown was nerfed) like Cho'gall you might want to use agony. I don't know the actual DPS numbers of different glyphs but replacing UA glyph via BoA glyph probably isn't a bad choice if the fight is ideal for agony though the DPS increase is probably going to minimal.

But I don't think there's a fight in Firelands where I'd use agony over doom. Maybe if you are only doing damage on Rhyolith's legs or something.

[Geni8itoFos]

Thnx for the reply and your time.I have visited many sites but i believe if you wanna ask something ask the proZ
I actually replaced BoA glyph to Corruption since the 4 sec of extra time provide less refresh ,free soul swap and extra damage in comparison to the small % of sb proc.In my point of view this sure extra dmg>proc.Futhermore ua glyph is major to me cause 0.2 sec in raid fight since i am going to keep all the time up its surely a long earned time

Plz correct me if this is a huge mistake